Tuesday, December 26, 2017

A 65-page Letter

-->
John Nichols sent me a 65-page letter after he read Unf*#!ing Believable. Laid up with a bad back and unable to work (he usually stays up all night writing and sleeps during the day), he managed to type the single-spaced letter on the ancient computer he uses as a word processor and then got his IT friends to translate it to printable material.

So what did he say in a 65-page letter? Well, first off, he warmed the cockles of my heart by telling me how much he loved the book and that “it is a beautiful, and powerful political and personal work and one of the best I have read in a long time.” But that only took a page or so. The 65 pages came from “much of what touched me so deeply is that you and I have shared many similar experiences in life, and your recounting of these experiences really struck home” and “triggered so many similarities in my own life.”

He then went on to discuss, page after page, these shared loves and experiences. Ten years older than I am he talked about his musical inspirations like Carl Perkins, Little Richard, Chuck Berry, Patsy Cline and all the old blues guys who were the genesis of much of the rhythm and blues folks I talk about in the book. He revealed that he actually took guitar lessons with the Reverend Gary Davis in the Bronx one summer. He plays guitar every other Monday with a group of friends in Taos.

A great sports fan, especially baseball, he couldn’t believe that I got so mad watching the Cubs and Indians (because of their mascot, Chief Wahoo) in the 2016 World Series that I turned off the TV (I turned it back on). When I saw him in person to talk about the letter I gave him some grief about his being a Boston Red Sox fan (racist town) and he explained it by referencing his childhood years of listening to their broadcasts on the radio and developing a loyalty. Loyalty came up a lot in the conversation: loyalty to teams (I lost my loyalty to the Lakers during the Kobe Bryant years); friends and family; political allies.

We share a history of journalism and political activism in northern New Mexico communities along with a love of the landscape that nurtures them. In the early 1970s I was a staff writer at the alternative rag Seer’s Catalog; John drew political cartoons for the paper. He was a contributor to the “muckraking journal” The New Mexico Review and helped Betita Martinez and Rini Templeton put out the Chicano movement newspaper El Grito del Norte. Arriving later in el norte, I regret never getting to meet Betita and Rini, but I did follow in their footsteps with my own radical rag La Jicarita News. We used to take photos of folks “reading La Jicarita” for promotion: Here’s John.


When we weren’t writing John and I were outdoors, he fly-fishing the Rio Grande, bird hunting, hiking, and snowshoeing; me, hiking, backpacking, cross-country skiing, downhill skiing. I put my love of the outdoors to financial use and published five guidebooks over the years while John found a more aesthetic value in publishing photography books (his latest, My Heart Belongs to Nature, was published this year). His roaming centered around his home in Taos County: the sagebrush mesas on the west side of the Rio Grande; the Wild and Scenic River canyon north of Questa; the Williams Lake/Wheeler Peak mountain terrain that he hiked and snowshoed. My ramblings took me further afield, throughout the vast Pecos Wilderness where I now live, across the Sandia and Manzano Mountains where I used to live, and all the places I explored for the guidebooks I wrote: San Pedro Parks Wilderness; Wheeler Peak and Columbine Hondo; cross-country skiing the Chama yurts; the Jemez Mountains; just about everywhere in northern New Mexico.

I learned about his health travails: asthma; a heart condition that led to open heart surgery in the 1990s; an inner ear condition that leaves him off balance; his struggles to get health insurance. About the only time he had it was when he worked in the movie industry writing screenplays and was covered under the Writer’s Guild. I learned a lot about that part of his career, too: the two years he was involved with Robert Redford’s filming of The Milagro Beanfield War that “almost killed me.”

He talked about capitalism, socialism, democracy, global domination, and conspicuous consumption. He’s about as close as there is to a Luddite: he’s not on the Internet (we communicate via the telephone and snail-mail); he lives in a three room adobe house near the Plaza; he drives a decades old truck; we share music via CDs as he has no iPod, no iPhone, no real computer (a word processor). He told stories about learning how to irrigate, grow gardens, raise animals and fix his first house in Ranchitos, helped and hindered by his neighbors who’d been doing it for centuries. He talked about the books we’d both read, the books he’s written, and the books I’ve written. And he talked about death. He lost his mother at age two and he almost died during the open-heart surgery.

When Mark died in 2010 John sent me two panoramas he’d constructed from photographs of the Lake Fork Peak area on the west side of Williams Lake, where he spent many days without seeing another soul. They highlight the peaks that ring the valley: Frazer, Wheeler, Simpson, Old Mike, Spoon Mountain, Lake Fork Peak. He wrote that my book, Day Hikes in the Taos Area, first guided him up Wheeler Peak. I have many chapters in Unf*#!ing Believable called “Diary of a Bad Year” that mostly talk about the 18 months Mark lived with the death sentence of pancreatic cancer. In his letter John says, “your descriptions of Mark dying break my heart and they are beautiful.” He’s working on a book about the “short life and quick death of my mom called Goodbye Monique.”

There was much more that was said in those 65 pages but this gives you an idea of the depth and breadth of John’s letter. He ended it like this: “As always, hasta la victoria, siempre. Or, as I remember Betita Martinez used to say, ‘Adelante, siempre! P’atras, nunca?’”





Thursday, December 14, 2017

#MeToo Part 2

-->
I’ve been reading and thinking about the #MeToo movement since I posted my #MeToo blog on November 4. While the intent of the movement is to encourage women to speak up about sexual harassment and abuse in all facets of our lives as an attack on systemic misogyny, it has quickly become complicated by—surprise—political co-option, which like everything else, brings us both good and bad fallout.

The political pivoting point appears to be Senator Al Franken. In a December 7 article in The New Yorker journalist Masha Gessen laid out what she sees as the moral divide between the party Franken belongs to and the party of Roy Moore, candidate for senator from Alabama accused of pedophilia. She points out that Moore is just an example of that’s party’s depravity, exhibited in full force by the tax cut bill, the racist travel ban, the pending Medicare and Medicaid cuts, and the support of an admitted harasser in the Oval Office.

Forced to resign by the Dems, Franken became their sacrificial lamb, or as conservative leaning Washington Post columnist Kathleen Parker put it, “it became clear that Franken’s job was to fall on his sword so Democrats could seize the high ground surrendered by Republicans.” Franken, who wanted to appear before the Senate ethics committee to explain his actions (he denies some of the accusations, has apologized for others, and says he “remembers things differently” on others), was forced out and denied due process.  

But Gessen takes the discussion beyond the argument over the moral divide: “The case of Franken makes it all that much more clear that this conversation is, in fact, about sex, not about power, violence, or illegal acts. The accusations against him, which involve groping and forcible kissing, arguably fall into the emergent, undefined, and most likely undefinable category of ‘sexual misconduct.’ Put more simply, Franken stands accused of acting repeatedly like a jerk, and he denies that he acted this way. The entire sequence of events, from the initial accusations to Franken’s resignation, is based on the premise that Americans, as a society, or at least half of a society, should be policing non-criminal behavior related to sex.”

The far right provocateurs are jumping into the sex policing business as well. As Rebecca Solnit writes in a December 10 Guardian article Mike Cernovitch, the alt-right conspiracy theorist, tried to get an MSNBC (left leaning) contributor fired over an anti-rape joke about Roman Polanski that Cernovitch didn’t get—or pretended not to get. Solnit points out, “if we’re going to fire everyone who has made a non-feminist remark we’re pretty much going to clear all the offices everywhere of almost every man and quite a few women,” and “when it comes to men in the legislative branch, they’re nearly all guilty of some form of sexual harassment, inappropriate behavior, insensitive remarks, and so forth. I suspect a high percentage of powerful heterosexual men in general are guilty of at least Franken’s degree of denigration of individual women, and if such things are grounds for dismissal, fairness would demand we dismiss them all.” (Former Lieutenant Governor Diane Denish just posted an opinion piece about legislator Michael Padilla, saying the allegations against him 12 years ago were heard and settled and now he’s being pushed out of his run for Lt. Gov. after no further accusations have been made.) 

So we become bogged down in who is guiltier than whom, who is going to decide that degree of guilt, and what is the punishment?  As misogyny exists in every aspect of our society, so should due process. That men like Franken are mostly seen as allies to the liberal cause and supportive of their female staff and fellow workers, so, too, should they abandon their support of positions that result in reinforcing systemic misogyny: Zionism, the American war machine, nuclear proliferation, etc.

Longtime feminist Robin Morgan addresses this disconnect in her blog post from December 4,  but from a slightly different perspective: “To prioritize a record of action on progressive issues—whether for racial equality, economic justice, environmental imperatives, peace activism, or any other aspect of forward-thinking politics, even including being supportive of feminism in the abstract—while abusing real women in the specific, sends what message? It sends the message that the female half of humanity somehow isn’t affected by racial inequality, economic injustice, environmental imperatives, war, and the rest—or else is affected only by those issues, which are important because they also affect men.”

As I wrote in #MeToo Part 1 I know the difference between rape and misconduct. It all has to go. As we wade through this difficult terrain, though, let’s prevent its hijacking by making sure we keep focused on never letting anyone treat us as less than a fully realized human being just as we treat them the same way.